Specificity and Context Dependent Preferences in Argumentation Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Dung and Son [6] argue that specificity as a criterion for resolving conflicts between arguments, is context dependent. They propose to use arguments address the dependency of in combination with new special argumentation semantics. Unfortunately, their solution restricted systems without undercutting arguments. This paper presents more general which allows any Moreover, applicable form dependent preferences.
منابع مشابه
Argumentation Context Systems: A Framework for Abstract Group Argumentation
We introduce a modular framework for distributed abstract argumentation where the argumentation context, that is information about preferences among arguments, values, validity, reasoning mode (skeptical vs. credulous) and even the chosen semantics can be explicitly represented. The framework consists of a collection of abstract argument systems connected via mediators. Each mediator integrates...
متن کاملRevisiting Preferences and Argumentation
The ASPIC framework is intermediate in abstraction between Dung’s argumentation framework and concrete instantiating logics. This paper generalises ASPIC to accommodate classical logic instantiations, and adopts a new proposal for evaluating extensions: attacks are used to define the notion of conflict-free sets, while the defeats obtained by applying preferences to attacks, are exclusively use...
متن کاملArgumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: Context and Recent Developments
This chapter provides a brief survey of argumentation in multi-agent systems. It is not only brief, but rather idiosyncratic, and focuses on the areas of research that most interest the authors, and those which seem to be the most active at the time of writing.
متن کاملDetermining Preferences Through Argumentation
Arguments concerning what an agent should do cannot be considered in isolation: they occur in the context of debates where arguments attacking and defending each other are advanced. This is recognised by the use of argumentation frameworks which determine the status of an argument by reference to its presence in a coherent position: a subset of the arguments advanced which is collectively able ...
متن کاملContext-Dependent Preferences in Starlings: Linking Ecology, Foraging and Choice
Foraging animals typically encounter opportunities that they either pursue or skip, but occasionally meet several alternatives simultaneously. Behavioural ecologists predict preferences using absolute properties of each option, while decision theorists focus on relative evaluations at the time of choice. We use European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to integrate ecological reasoning with decisio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Communications in computer and information science
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1865-0937', '1865-0929']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39144-6_8